Product Security Assessments

A structured review of your hardware and firmware that surfaces the security risks that matter most — ranked by impact, with a clear path to fix them before they become costly recalls.

An assessment looks broadly across the product to find where the real risk lives:

• Architecture and trust-boundary review
• Firmware and interface risk analysis
• Attack-surface mapping across hardware, firmware, radios, and cloud
• Prioritized vulnerability findings

An assessment is breadth-first and pragmatic, run as a repeatable test plan: review the architecture and documentation, map the attack surface, analyze the risks, then rank and report them — finishing with a live walkthrough so your team understands every finding.

• A ranked risk register tied to your product
• Prioritized findings with clear severity
• Concrete remediation guidance
• A live walkthrough and Q&A
• An optional pre-production security checklist

An assessment maps and ranks risk across the whole product; a penetration test goes deep to prove what is actually exploitable. Many teams start with an assessment to find the risks, then pen-test the highest-stakes areas.

Industrial IoT · Consumer Electronics · Medical Devices · Automotive · Data Infrastructure · Custom Hardware

• Mapping an IoT attack surface
• Prioritizing embedded vulnerabilities by impact
• A pre-production hardware security checklist
• A repeatable hardware security test plan
• Using the OWASP IoT methodology in practice

How is this different from a penetration test?
An assessment is a breadth-first risk review; a pen test is depth-first exploitation. They work well in sequence.

Do you need a physical device?
It helps, but an assessment can start from your architecture docs and firmware.

What do I get at the end?
A ranked set of risks, remediation guidance, and a live walkthrough.

Do you sign NDAs?
Yes — before we get into specifics.

Let’s identify the security risks in your product and rank what to fix first.