We map how your product can be attacked while it is still a diagram, then turn that into a short, ranked list of design changes your team can act on.
Most security problems in connected products are not coding bugs. They are design choices nobody questioned: a missing authentication step, a trust boundary no one drew, an update path with no signature. Threat modeling questions those choices on purpose, while a fix still costs an afternoon instead of a recall.
The cheapest time to run a threat model is before the first board spin, but it also pays off for products already in the field and for regulated devices where safety is on the line, like implantable medical devices.
Do you need hardware to start?
No. Threat modeling works from your architecture and data-flow descriptions, so we can start before anything is built.
How is this different from a pen test?
Threat modeling finds design flaws before they ship. A penetration test confirms what made it into the product.
What do you need from me?
A description of the system, its interfaces, and what you are protecting.
Do you sign NDAs?
Yes, always.
Let’s map your attack surface and turn it into a plan you can build from.